home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
012990
/
0129207.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
3KB
|
77 lines
<text id=90TT0267>
<title>
Jan. 29, 1990: Don't Aim That Pack At Us
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Jan. 29, 1990 Who Is The NRA?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
BUSINESS, Page 60
Don't Aim That Pack at Us
</hdr>
<body>
<p>A fiery outcry halts the test-marketing of a cigarette for
blacks
</p>
<p> To keep alive their shrinking market, tobacco companies have
shown marketing genius by creating more than 300 brands that
variously boast of being longer, slimmer, cheaper, flavored,
microfiltered, pastel colored or even striped. A new R.J.
Reynolds brand called Uptown looks typically glitzy with its
black-and-gold box and promise of a tasty menthol blend. But the
cigarette has provoked a response its maker never anticipated:
passionate protest. Last week the tobacco company, which
intended to begin test-marketing the cigarette next month in
Philadelphia, canceled those plans after community groups and
health organizations vehemently criticized the product. The
reason: Uptown is the first cigarette aimed specifically at
African-American smokers.
</p>
<p> To R.J. Reynolds, Uptown is simply a product designed to
appeal to a particular market segment. To critics, it represents
the cold-blooded targeting of blacks, who suffer a lung-cancer
rate 58% higher than whites. Uptown's opponents won powerful
support last week when Louis Sullivan, the Secretary of Health
and Human Services, blasted the cigarette-marketing plan. Said
he: "Uptown's message is more disease, more suffering and more
death for a group already bearing more than its share of
smoking-related illness and mortality." R.J. Reynolds, for its
part, denounced the "unfair and biased attention" that had been
focused on its product by a "small coalition of antismoking
zealots."
</p>
<p> As cigarette consumption has fallen in the U.S., tobacco
companies have increasingly directed their marketing to specific
groups, such as women, Hispanics and blacks. While 30.5% of
white males smoke, 39% of blacks do. Uptown was carefully
researched and designed: everything from its name to its
packaging was tailored to the tastes of the black consumer. "If
we were Sears developing a line of clothing for blacks," says
a Reynolds spokeswoman, "this would pass without any notice."
</p>
<p> Not all blacks appreciate the protest. Civil rights activist
Benjamin Hooks sees it as a form of paternalism. "Buried in this
line of thinking," he wrote recently, "is the rationale that
blacks are not capable of making their own free choices." His
comments reflect the reluctance of some black groups to attack
tobacco companies, which have donated money to support events
and causes ranging from jazz festivals to the United Negro
College Fund.
</p>
<p> Nonetheless, the Uptown controversy underscores a growing
concern that big corporations have targeted minority communities
as lucrative markets for such products as tobacco, liquor and
even junk food. A survey in Baltimore found that 20% of
billboard advertising in white communities was devoted to
smoking and drinking. In black neighborhoods 76% of the
billboards promoted such vices.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>